Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1109

reference
995-tree-1
name
1109
tree-preservation-order

undefined

995-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018526 50.876845)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018484 50.876840,-1.018485 50.876849,-1.018491 50.876856,-1.018501 50.876862,-1.018512 50.876866,-1.018526 50.876868,-1.018551 50.876863,-1.018560 50.876857,-1.018567 50.876849,-1.018569 50.876841,-1.018567 50.876833,-1.018561 50.876825,-1.018552 50.876819,-1.018540 50.876815,-1.018527 50.876814,-1.018514 50.876815,-1.018502 50.876819,-1.018492 50.876825,-1.018486 50.876832,-1.018484 50.876840)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL