Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1109

reference
997-tree-1
name
1109
tree-preservation-order

undefined

997-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018256 50.876826)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018214 50.876821,-1.018216 50.876830,-1.018222 50.876837,-1.018231 50.876843,-1.018243 50.876847,-1.018256 50.876849,-1.018269 50.876848,-1.018281 50.876844,-1.018291 50.876838,-1.018297 50.876830,-1.018299 50.876822,-1.018297 50.876814,-1.018291 50.876806,-1.018282 50.876800,-1.018270 50.876796,-1.018257 50.876795,-1.018244 50.876796,-1.018232 50.876800,-1.018222 50.876806,-1.018216 50.876813,-1.018214 50.876821)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL