Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1109

reference
998-tree-1
name
1109
tree-preservation-order

undefined

998-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018791 50.876426)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018677 50.876414,-1.018682 50.876437,-1.018698 50.876457,-1.018723 50.876473,-1.018754 50.876483,-1.018789 50.876487,-1.018825 50.876484,-1.018857 50.876474,-1.018882 50.876458,-1.018899 50.876438,-1.018905 50.876416,-1.018900 50.876394,-1.018884 50.876374,-1.018859 50.876358,-1.018828 50.876347,-1.018792 50.876343,-1.018757 50.876347,-1.018725 50.876357,-1.018700 50.876372,-1.018683 50.876392,-1.018677 50.876414)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL